In the past two months, political and economic news has been redundant. The same players in politics with very little cognitive ideas and an economic constant picture instead of an evolving video. When things are this consistent, I get bored. Thus, I am writing a scientific article based on extrapolation of recent academic findings. This article will be called a "NEW THEORY OF EXCLUSIVE RELATIVITY". If you are now starting to laugh, I don't blame you, but bear with me a little longer, for I do not jest and will attempt to validate this theory based on Quantum physics and Einstein's quest for a general theory of relativity. I will elucidate in layman's language, for I believe esoteric prose should be resigned to those that are so deeply involved in their thoughts, that they frequently limit their vision and effectiveness.
The principle of relativity also known as the Special Theory of Relativity, which treats space and time on an equal footing such that the velocity of light is constant in this four dimensional space-time. It implies that space and time can transform among each other in different inertial systems. Einstein proposed the General Theory of Relativity. In general relativity, it is postulated that the curvature of space-time determines gravity. The mass-energy generates the curvature of space-time and particles moving along the geodesic in this four dimensional curved space. The geodesic is the shortest distance between two points. It is a straight line only in Euclidean space (flat space); it would be different in the curved space (Riemann space) { E=Mc² }.
On the other side of physics is Quantum physics. This involves quarks as an elementary particle and a fundamental constituent of matter. Quarks combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei. I'll further simplify to only spin identified neutrinos. Quarks are the only elementary particles in particle physics to experience all four fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the elementary charge. For every quark flavor there is a corresponding type of antiparticle, known as anti-quark, that differs from the quark only in that some of its properties have equal magnitude but opposite sign. A tachyon (mentioned above) is a hypothetical particle that travels faster than the speed of light and has an imaginary rest mass.
General relativity and quantum theory describe two extreme of physics - the former is on the very large scale up to the whole universe, while the latter is on the smallest possible scale down to the size of elementary particles. However, there are many instances in which both general relativity and quantum theory are equally important and a common framework is essential. One obvious such instance is in the very early universe, immediately after the Big Bang, when the size is very small and the curvature of space-time were nearly infinite. Much of the difficulty in merging these theories comes from the radically different assumptions that these theories make on how the universe works. Quantum field theory depends on particle fields embedded in a fixed flat space-time, while general relativity models gravity as space-time curvature that changes as mass moves.
Recent experiments (9/22/11) where scientists at CERN, the world's largest physics lab near Geneva, stunned the world of science by announcing they had observed tiny particles known as neutrinos travelling slightly faster than light. According to Einstein, that is impossible! If E=Mc², then c=√f(E/M) and M=C²/E. To merge these theories and grant that the speed of light is a constant, time is important. At any moment c is constant, but when introduced to the fourth dimension of time, the speed of light exceeds c. To explain this, only at the moment when M and E merge (Big Bang Theory) can c² dilute to unity and E=Mc. After this event, Einstein's theory is irresolute because Energy and Matter have separated from unity.
Think of the time space concept. It is stated that as the speed of matter approaches the speed of light, time essentially stands still, but cannot go backwards. This is true, in that once M actually equaled c, then there is no light, as all matter and energy have been condensed into an infinitesimally small ball of pure ME. This situation occurs only in two event horizons. One is the big bang, the other is on the small scale of a black hole, or a leak between time and matter. We all understand the concept of multiple universes as proposed in string theory, but this theory weakens when the recent CERN experiments prove it to be inconsistent.
There are not multiple universes. In the Exclusive Theory of Relativity, matter and energy cannot exist together unless c is K. View that as time allowing the two to exist nearly side by side, separated by an infinitesimal shift in time. As a matter of simplicity, think of energy as the potential merging of matter and anti-matter by nature or man as the time dimension is momentarily breached. As the quantitative shift becomes smaller, then the energy release becomes larger. Expressed mathematically, E=Mc²∫(time).
This is a concept and needs proof, but it does merge the two into a unified whole. I propose that as scientists learn more about quarks and photons and see more examples of instantaneous shifts in spin as recorded in normal time, I believe this concept will become more apparent. Thanks for your time.